Thursday, December 24, 2009
The Attacks South Philadelphia High School: A Plea for School and Social Reform
The Nostalgia of Holiday Gifting
Saturday, November 21, 2009
David Lowenthal "Past Time, Present Place: Landscape and Memory"
Sunday, November 15, 2009
who's coming ???

For many families in the province of Québec, sugar time is like an annual pilgrimage. It is a time to revisit the foundations of our heritage and its values, to meet with family and friends eating, singing and dancing to songs and music transmitted from generation to generation. In a way it is a return to our roots reminding us of who we are and what we have been through. It is a cheerful period when on a Sunday afternoon you forget your troubles, appointments, deal signings and phone messages to return.
Wednesday, November 11, 2009
THE GOTHIC

Sunday, November 8, 2009
Saturday, October 24, 2009
The Legacy of Liberal Tolerance
Sunday, October 4, 2009
Thursday, September 24, 2009
Friday, September 4, 2009
Monday, August 31, 2009
Saturday, August 29, 2009
The Specter of Bush-Cheney
On July 30th a federal judge ordered the release of Mohammed Jawad, a former Guantánamo detainee represented by the ACLU, and was originally detained at roughly the age of 13. It was determined that his confession to throwing a grenade that injured 2 US soldiers was obtained under torture by Afghani Police, and therefore not usable in court. This sparked a renewed interest by the Justice Department into the treatment of detainees, but limited to cases handled by the CIA.
To everyone's great surprise this inquiry unearthed some rather erie Justice Department memos outlining acceptable forms of torture. The Rachel Maddow Show highlights some particularly horrendous "abuses" found in the sparsely declassified sections of the report, including: mock executions used to frighten detainees, water boarding an individual 183 times, a pressure point technique that restricted the flow of oxygen to the brain, a report of detainee beaten to the point of death, threats against the children of detainees and a threat that a detainee's mother would be raped in front the detainee.
How could such horror occur? Thank God we have our liberal pragmatic messiah committed to Judicial oversight, international law, and diplomacy. After all, one of Obama's first moves in office was to announce the closing of Guantánamo, a move that Cheney fiercely denounced in town hall meetings across the country. Yet, something went awry with Obama's commitment to ending the horrors of the Bush-Cheney years. He seemed to have inadvertently enabled the continuation of torture by defining detainees as "products of counterterrorism operations rather than of armed conflict." Now Obama and the Justice Department are alleging to investigate illegal uses of torture, however, perhaps because of some sort of very clever Bush-Cheney specter, torture is still widespread and legal!
What happened?! Well, Obama has actually only outlawed detention centers operated by the CIA under a non short term/transitional basis (whatever that means), while additionally leaving open the potential for torture in any military or privately contracted detention center. Obama and Eric Holder, the Attorney General, are not questioning torture as a reliable method of obtaining confessions, but rather specific non prescribed torture tactics such as the staging of mock executions. Last time I checked the Geneva conventions did not allow for water boarding someone over a 100 times and outsourcing particularly horrendous torture tactics to privately contracted defense forces.
All of this amounts to little more than a liberal facelift of Bush policies. The Justice Department may release innocent people based on flimsy evidence, but it has little interest in prosecuting those who committed torture or even in ending torture in our current "counter terrorist" operations.
Saturday, August 22, 2009
Friday, August 21, 2009
Wednesday, August 19, 2009
Francis Bacon's Poetics of the Grotesque
The retrospective for the twentieth century figurative painter Francis Bacon on view at the Metropolitan Museum of Art shows Bacon's belaboring exploration of the grotesque. He is fixated on both religious iconography such as in his paintings inspired by Velazquez, and malformed depictions of enigmatic carcasses.
Though Bacon seems to recycle the same sort of grotesque in his oeuvre to an extent that becomes exhausting there is something still powerful in his poetics of the grotesque. He reminds us of bygone times before the age of the laboratory and medicalization of illness when the temple was a site of ritual killings and sacrifice. As Yve Alain Bois remarks in his essay, "Base Materialism," on Bataille and the photographer Eli Lotar: We live in an age where the slaughterhouse, just like the madman, is quarantined from everyday life. In his triptych series titled after the T.S. Eliot poem Sweeney Agonistes, Bacon depicts enigmatic fragmented lumps of life matter. The extreme upward tilt of the paintings draws the viewer into the painting, while having the contradictory effect of flattening the picture plane. In portraying such liminal figures that hover between life and death and inserting them between flat and deep space, one confronts the return of the repressed. That which is repressed and sublimated inevitably intrudes as the signified momentarily catches up to and disrupts the signifier. The horror in these works is in their representing the repression of violence. As Bois argues: "To show violence purely and simply would be a way of incorporating it; it is more effective to underscore how it is evacuated."
Bacon's painting Blood on Pavement similarly hovers between deep and flat space. The obscure blood stain is a trace of a violence and trauma that remains absent. The horror of Bacon's imagery lies not in its portrayal of violence, but rather in its undefinability that places the viewer between the sublimation and intrusion of the trauma. It is a horror that remains truly other and resists incorporation and resolution in the quotidian. He reminds us that the comforting sanctity of our daily latte and other objects of commercial consumption is continually haunted by wars, sweatshops, and environmental devastation. Bacon does not naively revel in the violence of the status quo, but rather exposes the ways in which we sublimate and expunge the traces of violence in presenting objects which remain liminal and resist foreclosure.
Thursday, February 19, 2009
Latest concern
Sunday, February 15, 2009
apple cider vinegar cures all
Friday, January 23, 2009
Being interrogated by people much younger than I
Wednesday, December 31, 2008
2009
Sunday, November 30, 2008
Obviously I have too much free time
Here's an overview I found online (this website places the beginning of the cusp at the 20th, but Jashin's book started it at the 19th, my birthday) :
-- Possess the flighty and energetic traits inherent in Gemini --
-- Possess the deep feeling inherent in Cancer --
-- Often categorized as inspired individuals --
-- Intensely devoted to loved ones --
-- Find it difficult to keep an eye on the desired goal --
-- Prone to drift --
-- Apt to repress feelings --
AND-
Notable Gemini/Cancer Cuspians Include:
Cyndi Lauper; Errol Flynn; Meryl Streep; Kris Krisofferson; and Phylicia Rashad (absent from the list: Jean Paul Sartre, born June 21, 1905).
some possible good news
Friday, November 28, 2008
more griping
Robert Rubin, an economic adviser to Obama, oversaw the risk management at the recently collapsed super bank Citigroup. Larry Summers, soon to be the director of Obama's National Economic Council, the Treasury Secretary under Clinton "championed the law that deregulated derivatives, the financial instruments — a k a toxic assets — that have spread the financial losses from reckless lending around the globe." Larry Summers also worked at the IMF, along with Geithner, the current president of the Federal Reserve and Obama's pick for Treasury Secretary. Each one of these picks represent an ideology of deregulation and neoliberalism that fueled our current economic crisis; And these are the people that are supposed to steer the ship of state toward its salvation with policies of 'change' and 'spreading around the wealth????'
Tuesday, November 25, 2008
Obama's (dis)appointments
"..what we can expect from Summers and Geithner, I think it's clear that there's going to be a major departure from the idea logy that the government can't do anything...we're going to see a lot of investments in infrastructure...but the key issue and this is where I think we want to concentrate our energies because...we all want to be optimistic, but I think part of what got us into this situation where we've seen these very disappointing appointments has been that we have not been honest about the legacy of the Clinton years. So much mis-information has been spread during the election campaign because it was a nice message to present the '90s as these wonder years in contrast to the Bush years, and that is exactly the situation when you have a Summers [Secretary of the Treasury under Clinton, and recently picked by Obama to head the National Economic Council] going down as some sort of wise man instead of going down with Allen Greenspan."
Also check out Jeremey Scahill's piece on Alternet highlighting the 'liberal hawks' behind Obama's foreign policy team.
Tuesday, October 28, 2008
to the very small number of californians who read this
Our Supposed Capitalist-Socialist Hybrid Economy
"The rot comes from predators posing as conservatives and mouthing the rhetoric of “free markets.” They are not actually interested in free markets. Their goal is to use the government to build monopolies, to control resources, to block regulation, to crush unions, to divert as much as possible from taxpayers into private pockets."
The idea that America is a mix of capitalism and socialism is now the new liberal parlance. The central flaws of capitalism, its reifying logic of unfettered and self interested competing parties that gracefully ignores a sub-history of blood/slavery/exploitation, are no longer relevant now that capitalism has subsumed socialism with things like welfare, public housing, income tax, and public education. (Never mind the labor wars that ensured every one of these things, and continue to be the basis for 'change' and corporate benevolence).
Of course, 'they,' Bush and his cronies, oligarchs consisting of developers-Bechtel and Haliburton- and oil companies, represent a perversion of our harmoniously mixed hybrid capitalism. While Galbraith's criticism of corporations manipulating government to gain contracts and power rings very true, the theoretically underpinnings of his critique are quite murky.
Should the government untangle itself from big business, and in what way in particular (in campaign reform/corporate lobbying or in dismantling welfare and regulation à la Clinton) , and if it does then is it the case that the underlying principles of the 'free market' will best serve our public interests? The irony of Galbraith's critique is that it ends with a plea for meeting our climate crisis via "direct public action and the cooperation of the private sector," or in other words, government contracts with (renewable) energy corporations (which was the basis of his critique of Bush & Company).
The central questions that haunt Galbraith's critique:
a) Are public interests best met through free markets?
b) Is profit in a capitalist system of exponential growth based on immutable principles of supply and demand or is it rather based on exploitation/ constantly being overcharged for services to fill the pockets of the top 1% who control 33% of the wealth and CEOs who make about 400 times that of the average worker?
c) If we accept a hybrid of government planning/money and the private sector how can this do anything but enabling monopolies and public spending that is well beyond the cost of the actual services?









